Buffalo State
Daily Bulletin

Friday, November 28, 2014 | Daily Bulletin RSS

  <   November 2014  >  






























date sepatator

Posted: Thursday, April 25, 2013

Response to College Senate Recommendations: Student Fees

At its March 8, 2013, meeting, the College Senate voted to recommend to the president that there be no ($0) increase in the student Technology and Athletic fees for the 2013–2014 academic year.

At its April 12, 2013, meeting, the College Senate voted to recommend to the president the following actions on the student Transportation and Health fees for the 2013–2014 academic year:

  • Increase the Transportation Fee by $15 per year in 2013–2014 to meet the college’s NFTA contractual obligation. The remainder of the contract will be paid in full by the campus without an increase to any student fees.

  • Increase the Health Fee by $7.50 per year in 2013–2014.
  • All student Health Fee revenue must be spent only on health, counseling, and prevention services and related programs, and the $114,400 per year currently funding other Student Affairs offices should be returned to support appropriate student health activities no later than July 1, 2014.

Buffalo State is second lowest in broad-based fees among the 12 SUNY comprehensive colleges, eight technology colleges, and four research centers. Our current broad-based fees of $1,124 are $1,145 lower than the $2,269 charged by the University at Buffalo for 2012–2013. Empire State College and the special schools, such as SUNY Upstate and Downstate Medical Centers, charge differently than other comprehensives and technology colleges and research centers, so it would not be valid to include them in this comparison.

Six broad-based fees are under consideration. Three fees, the College Fee, the Activity Fee, and the Technology Fee, will not be increased for 2013–2014.

Three fees will be increased, and some clarification is in order.

The Athletic Fee will be increased $5.50 for an academic year (2.0%). I note that significant student feedback supports the fee increase. A suggestion to move salaries to general fund lines to reduce benefit costs has been made. Careful review of this proposal is necessary for at least two reasons:

  1. Our strategic direction, enunciated at this year’s State of the College address, is focused on restoring full-time faculty lines and with a goal of reaching 330 full-time faculty members. I believe that shifting coaches’ or other salaries from fees to the general fund budget will have an impact on that focus. This will be reviewed in an all funds budget context.
  2. Two decades ago, SUNY shifted athletic costs to fees. This shift moved SUNY away from what is often called the “beer and circus” view of athletics and higher education to a focus on academics. Serious study of the long-term consequences of funding athletics from the general fund is necessary, and before I would approve such a policy change, I would need a policy review of academic, not merely financial, implications.